Your portfolio company just closed. The dust is settling. And buried in the procurement spend is a line item that could make or break your investment thesis: resin.
Most private equity (PE) firms treat resin like any other procurement category. Yet it often represents the single largest controllable cost in manufacturing—up to 75% of part cost in plastics-intensive operations. That gap between its impact and the attention it receives makes resin one of the fastest value creation levers you can pull post-close.
Unfortunately, traditional procurement methods usually miss this opportunity entirely.
Generic playbooks and spend analytics platforms don’t have the specialized market knowledge to tackle resin's extreme technicalities and opaque pricing. They treat it like any other cost when, in reality, it’s anything but ordinary. And that’s putting it mildly.
But we’re changing all of that with this guide. Drawing on decades of frontline resin procurement experience, we've built something PE firms have been missing: a practical, step-by-step roadmap designed specifically for portfolio company value creation. Not theory. Not generic best practices. Instead, a proven process you can start implementing today, from quick wins in the first 90 days to structural improvements that compound value through your hold period.
The firms that get resin right don't just save money. They transform a volatile cost center into a predictable competitive advantage. And in a market where operational improvements separate winners from also-rans, that advantage compounds fast. So let’s get to it.
The global resin market is massive—$925.8 billion in 2025, projected to hit $1.3 trillion by 2033. For PE firms with manufacturing portfolios, that scale means resin touches nearly every investment, driving costs that directly impact returns.
Thus, resin procurement has moved from the back office to the boardroom. When a single category can represent your largest controllable cost, when price swings can erase quarters of operational improvements overnight, procurement becomes strategy, as critical to post-close success as any revenue initiative.
Yet most portfolio companies are playing defense, not offense.
Walk into any newly acquired manufacturer and you'll typically discover the same procurement challenges:
But these aren't just inefficiencies. They're opportunities. Again, while resin looks like any other raw material on a P&L, it behaves nothing like traditional procurement categories:
And that’s just for starters. As a result, these dynamics trap manufacturers in a costly cycle, absorbing volatility they can't predict, paying premiums they can't identify, and locked into contracts they can't optimize. In the bigger picture, the resulting margin pressure isn't so much from rising costs as it is from underlying procurement strategies that haven't evolved to match market realities.
Still, there’s very good news buried within this mountain of negativity:
Procurement offers something unique for PE value creation where, unlike revenue growth or market expansion, procurement improvements are entirely within your control.
You don't need customer approval. You don't need market conditions to align. You just need the right approach, the right data, and the commitment to treat procurement as the strategic function it's become.
The opportunity is massive and entirely capturable. The question is how to systematically extract it.
Systematic extraction requires more than good intentions and a few supplier meetings. It requires a proven process that transforms procurement from a scramble into a science.
The roadmap that follows isn't theoretical. It's been refined across dozens of portfolio companies, each phase building on the last to create capabilities that compound over time. Quick wins in the first 90 days fund deeper initiatives. Early data collection enables smarter negotiations. Small pilots prove what's possible before you bet big.
Most importantly, this approach recognizes that lasting change happens in stages. You can't revolutionize procurement overnight, nor should you try. Instead, you build momentum methodically, from assessment through implementation to optimization, turning resin procurement from a cost center into a competitive advantage that strengthens throughout your hold period.
Goal: Build visibility into resin spend and secure quick wins.
The first 90 days set the tone for everything that follows. You need that momentum we mentioned, but you also need understanding. Push too hard without grasping the technical requirements and you'll make costly mistakes. Move too cautiously and you'll miss the post-acquisition window when change is expected.
Start with the fundamentals: you can't optimize what you can't see. Most portfolio companies have resin data scattered across multiple systems, facilities, and business units. Your first priority is consolidating this chaos into clarity.
Build complete spend visibility:
Benchmark against market reality:
Hunt for rationalization opportunities:
Secure early wins:
Remember, Phase 1 isn't transformational. It's foundational. The data you gather, the relationships you build, and the credibility you earn in these first 90 days determine whether procurement becomes a sustainable competitive advantage or another abandoned initiative.
Most importantly, the quick wins aren't just for show. They fund what comes next. That 5% you save through payment term improvements? That's the budget for the procurement talent you'll need in Phase 2. The trust you build with operations by involving them early? That's the political capital you'll spend when pushing bigger changes. Everything compounds.
Goal: Lock in structural savings and build resilience.
Phase 1 gave you visibility and quick wins. Now it's time for the moves that fundamentally reshape your resin economics. This is where procurement shifts from tactical cost-cutting to strategic value creation. In other words, the difference between saving 5% and saving 15%.
The structural changes you make now will define your resin costs for years. Move deliberately but decisively. Every month you delay is margin left on the table.
Rationalize your supplier base strategically:
Launch portfolio-wide RFPs:
Shift to market-aligned pricing:
Pilot alternative materials:
Deploy real procurement technology:
Phase 2 is where good intentions become lasting change. The suppliers you qualify, the contracts you structure, and the systems you build create a procurement foundation that generates value long after the consultants leave.
More importantly, this phase proves the model at scale. When the board sees 10-15% sustainable cost reduction across the portfolio—not just one-time wins but structural improvements—procurement graduates from cost center to value driver. That shift in perception unlocks resources and support for the continuous optimization that defines true procurement excellence.
Goal: Institutionalize best practices and evolve into advanced strategies.
You've captured the low-hanging fruit. You've restructured contracts and rationalized suppliers. Now comes the harder work: making excellence systematic. Phase 3 transforms procurement from a project into a capability, one that builds value through your entire hold period and drives exit multiples.
Now you institutionalize what works, building processes that keep delivering savings long after the initial push.
Establish governance that sticks:
Foster cross-portfolio collaboration:
Deploy sophisticated risk management:
Embed sustainability metrics:
Leverage emerging technology:
Phase 3 separates firms that achieve temporary cost reduction from those that build a lasting edge. The systems you implement, the capabilities you develop, and the culture you create determine whether procurement remains a value driver through exit.
Most importantly, these capabilities become a selling point themselves. When potential buyers see sophisticated procurement operations delivering consistent results, they see sustainable value, not just historical savings. They see a platform for continued improvement, not a squeezed lemon.
Resin Procurement Roadmap:
Phase |
Timeframe |
Goal |
Key Actions |
Questions to Ask |
Phase 1: Assessment & Planning |
0–90 days |
Build visibility into resin spend and secure early wins |
• Consolidate spend data• Benchmark prices• Identify grade overlaps• Secure quick wins |
• Do we know true spend?• Are prices above benchmarks?• Any redundant grades?• Contracts up soon? |
Phase 2: Strategic Implementation |
3–12 months |
Lock in structural savings and build resilience |
• Rationalize suppliers• Launch RFPs• Shift to index pricing• Pilot recycled resins• Deploy tools |
• Can demand be aggregated?• Too reliant on one supplier?• Which contracts need index pricing?• Where to pilot alternates?• Do we track portfolio-wide? |
Phase 3: Continuous Optimization |
12+ months |
Institutionalize best practices and evolve into advanced strategies |
• Hold reviews• Share best practices• Add risk tools• Embed ESG• Adopt AI |
• Are KPIs at board level?• How do we share wins?• Where could hedging help?• What ESG goals apply?• Which tech improves foresight? |
Every PE firm tracks procurement metrics. But resin requires a different lens. Its volatility, technical complexity, and market opacity mean standard KPIs can mislead as easily as they inform.
The biggest challenge is understanding what the measurements actually mean in resin's unique context. A 10% cost reduction might be a home run in most categories, but if resin markets dropped 15% in the same period, you actually underperformed. On the other hand, holding prices flat while markets spike 20% represents massive value creation that traditional metrics might miss entirely.
Most procurement scorecards treat all spend categories equally. But as we’ve already said many times at this point, resin is a different beast, so measuring it requires adjustments that can account for those unique dynamics.
The index relativity problem.
Unlike categories with stable baselines, resin prices swing wildly month to month. Absolute cost reduction means nothing without market context. You need to track your delta to index, not just your unit price. More importantly, you need to understand that different indices tell different stories—CDI might show flat while ICIS shows an increase. Which one's in your contract matters more than which one's "correct."
The grade complexity challenge.
When you're buying 50 different grades across multiple facilities, aggregated metrics hide critical details. That 5% overall savings might include 20% savings on commodity grades and 10% increases on specialties you couldn't avoid. Portfolio-level metrics need grade-level backup to be meaningful.
The total cost trap.
Resin savings evaporate quickly when you factor in processing changes. A 10% cheaper resin that runs 5% slower costs more in the long run. But most procurement dashboards don't capture these operational impacts until it's too late. You need metrics that span from supplier invoice to finished product.
Of course, we’re not suggesting you should abandon traditional KPIs. We just recommend adapting them for resin's realities. For instance:
Track spreads, not just prices.
Your primary metric should be the spread between your price and relevant index benchmarks. But go deeper than that: track the spread between spot and contract prices, between different regions, and between virgin and recycled grades. These spreads reveal arbitrage opportunities that simple price tracking misses.
Best-in-class buyers can achieve 3-7% below index for commodity grades here, though specialties typically trade closer to index where volume provides less leverage.
Measure volatility capture.
In stable markets, steady pricing is good. In volatile markets, it might mean you're missing opportunities. Track what percentage of favorable market moves you capture versus unfavorable moves you avoid. Aim to capture the majority of market drops while avoiding most spikes, although the exact ratio depends on your risk tolerance and market position.
Monitor grade rationalization impact.
Every grade you eliminate improves leverage and reduces complexity. Track both the direct savings (often 5-10% from improved volume concentration) and indirect benefits: reduced inventory, simplified operations, fewer supplier touchpoints. But also track quality and performance metrics to ensure consolidation isn't creating hidden costs.
Create supplier scorecards that reflect resin realities.
OTIF matters, but so does allocation behavior during shortages. Likewise, price competitiveness matters, but so does transparency about market drivers. Build scorecards that capture both operational performance and strategic partnership value.
Example Resin Procurement KPI Framework:
Metric |
Why It Matters |
Example Target |
Example Trigger |
Index Delta (Spread vs. Benchmark) |
Shows if you’re outperforming or lagging the market. |
3–7% below index on commodity grades. |
Price >5% above index → renegotiate. |
Contract Coverage Ratio |
Balance between spot leverage and supply security. |
70–80% under contract. |
Coverage >90% = missed drops; <60% = supply risk. |
Supplier Concentration Risk |
Prevents overreliance on a single supplier or grade. |
Top supplier ≤40% overall, ≤80% for a grade. |
Exceeding threshold → initiate dual-sourcing. |
Grade Rationalization Impact |
Fewer grades = more leverage and lower complexity. |
5–10% savings from consolidation. |
Redundant grades → consolidate within 90 days. |
Market Intelligence Latency |
Time lag between market signals and procurement action. |
Awareness before supplier increase letters. |
If lag >2 weeks → strengthen intelligence sources. |
After analyzing dozens of PE resin procurement transformations, certain forward-looking metrics consistently separate winners from losers:
Contract coverage ratio.
What percentage of your volume is under contract versus spot? The sweet spot typically lands around 70-80%, leaving room to capitalize on spot opportunities while maintaining supply security. Too much coverage and you miss market drops. Too little and you're exposed to spikes.
Supplier concentration risk.
Track your top supplier's share of spend, but also track your top supplier's share of any single critical grade. Overall concentration might be acceptable at 40%, but if one supplier controls 90% of a grade you can't substitute, making you vulnerable.
Alternative qualification pipeline.
How many grades have qualified alternatives ready to go? This metric predicts your ability to respond to supply disruptions or price spikes. The strongest performers maintain alternatives for all commodity grades and at least half their specialties.
Market intelligence latency.
How quickly do you hear about market changes versus when they impact your prices? If you're learning about feedstock moves from supplier increase letters, you're already behind. Track the delta between market signals and your awareness of them.
The best dashboards don't just report history. They also trigger decision-making. For resin, that means building in automatic alerts and action triggers like, for instance:
Obviously, these thresholds vary by grade, market conditions, and business requirements. So, the triggers for commodity PP in packaging won't match those for automotive specialties.
Finally, most procurement dashboards are backwards-looking. But resin's volatility rewards teams that look forward. Therefore, you’ll want to track metrics that predict future performance:
Remember, the firms that win in resin procurement aren't necessarily those with the most metrics. Rather, they're the ones whose metrics account for resin's uniqueness and drive specific actions. Because in a market this volatile, measurement is most valuable when it gives you better signals than your competition.
Every strategy in this guide becomes more powerful with real-time intelligence. Put differently, the difference between capturing modest savings and transformative results often comes down to information speed.
Yet most procurement teams still operate with tools built for a different era. Traditional spend analytics platforms can't interpret feedstock relationships, don't understand regional arbitrage, and miss allocation risks during supply crunches. They treat resin like any other commodity when we all know that couldn’t be further from the truth.
This information gap keeps procurement teams reactive, always responding to changes rather than anticipating them. In reality, the firms capturing the most value have already shifted to predictive intelligence, analyzing what's coming rather than focusing on what’s already happened.
Which side do you want to be on?
Real-Time Data & Predictive Analytics:
Traditional Procurement |
With Real-Time + Predictive Data (ResinSmart) |
Relies on lagging quarterly/annual reports |
Uses real-time feedstock, resin index, and contract data |
Buyers are reactive — negotiating after price changes |
Buyers are proactive — anticipating market moves and renegotiating ahead of time |
Missed arbitrage opportunities |
Predictive analytics surface savings opportunities across categories/suppliers |
Limited visibility at portfolio level |
Portfolio-wide dashboards enable consolidated action across portcos |
ResinSmart combines the real-time intelligence and predictive analytics that turn the strategies we’ve discussed into measurable results. Built specifically for resin's unique dynamics, our platform helps you:
The playbook is proven. The opportunity is massive. And the only missing piece is the intelligence to capture it.
Ready to see what you're leaving on the table?
Ready to turn volatility into value? Schedule a ResinSmart demo and see how predictive intelligence can unlock hidden EBITDA in your portfolio